Overview
This page compares USDY and WLD with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#40 vs #61) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $0.315700 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $1.13B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.16M | $9.97M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 61.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.20% | +4.85% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for USDY/WLD currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
WLD
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- USDY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for USDY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on USDY may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of USDY
- Crowded positioning around USDY sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, USDY can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of WLD
- PEPS tracking for WLD still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- WLD can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus USDY with WLD can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of WLD
- Relative underperformance versus USDY can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on WLD cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on WLD often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for USDY on size and WLD on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. USDY holds market-cap $2.15B and rank #40; WLD shows $1.13B and #61. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch WLD. Where durability matters, watch USDY. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or WLD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while WLD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or WLD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and WLD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. WLD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is WLD, but longer windows can disagree.