Overview
USDY vs GNO is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,865.83 | $104.93 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $276.78M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.95M | $71,269.43 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 129.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +0.30% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for USDY/GNO currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
GNO
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- Composite PEPS readings for USDY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for USDY can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- USDY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of USDY
- When dominance narratives fade, USDY can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit USDY harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on USDY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for USDY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of GNO
- Narrative optionality around GNO can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, GNO may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of GNO
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave GNO more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on GNO often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus USDY can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for USDY on size and USDY on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: USDY (USDY) trades near $1,865.83 with a +0.00% day move, while GNO (GNO) is around $104.93 (+0.30%). Volume leadership currently sits with USDY, and market-cap leadership with USDY. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or GNO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while GNO leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or GNO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and GNO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USDY currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GNO, but longer windows can disagree.