Overview
Whether you arrived from a “GUSD vs NEO” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GUSD | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.998974 | $1.83 |
| Market Cap | $149.64M | $129.04M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $788,705.00 | $2.32M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 196.00 | 215.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GUSD | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.10% | +0.80% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GUSD | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GUSD | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GUSD
NEO
Pros and cons
Pros of GUSD
- GUSD often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Market-cap scale on GUSD may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for GUSD can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- GUSD typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of GUSD
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Indicator stacks on GUSD may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for GUSD can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of NEO
- PEPS tracking for NEO still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, NEO may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus GUSD with NEO can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of NEO
- Relative underperformance versus GUSD can persist through entire market regimes.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave NEO more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (GUSD) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (NEO) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. GUSD holds market-cap $149.64M and rank #196; NEO shows $129.04M and #215. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch NEO. Where durability matters, watch GUSD. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, GUSD or NEO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GUSD leads on market cap today, while NEO leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GUSD or NEO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GUSD and NEO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. NEO currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is NEO, but longer windows can disagree.