Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means NEAR Protocol and STAC are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | NEAR | STAC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.71 | $1,856.18 |
| Market Cap | $2.35B | $102.63M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $13.26M | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 39.00 | 252.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +5.80% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | NEAR | STAC |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.47% | -0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | NEAR | STAC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 41.87 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.10 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 13.52 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1.65 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1.88 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 64.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across NEAR Protocol and STAC, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | NEAR | STAC |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 103.00 | — |
| Github activity | 2,590.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
NEAR Protocol
STAC
Pros and cons
Pros of NEAR Protocol
- Higher ranking for NEAR Protocol can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on NEAR Protocol may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of NEAR Protocol
- Large-cap status for NEAR Protocol can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, NEAR Protocol can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around NEAR sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of STAC
- Narrative optionality around STAC can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus NEAR Protocol with STAC can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, STAC may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on STAC sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of STAC
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave STAC more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for STAC.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. NEAR Protocol and STAC can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put NEAR Protocol at $1.71 and STAC at $1,856.18. Relative performance over 24h (STAC) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, NEAR Protocol or STAC?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. NEAR Protocol leads on market cap today, while STAC leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, NEAR or STAC?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both NEAR Protocol and STAC.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. NEAR Protocol currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is STAC, but longer windows can disagree.