Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Monero and WM are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | XMR | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $365.02 | $1,880.52 |
| Market Cap | $6.85B | $83.05M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $74.44M | $30,272.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 17.00 | 283.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | XMR | WM |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.20% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | XMR | WM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Monero and WM, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | XMR | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Monero
WM
Pros and cons
Pros of Monero
- Higher ranking for Monero can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Monero has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Monero typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for Monero can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Monero
- When dominance narratives fade, Monero can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Monero harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around XMR sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Monero can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of WM
- Diversifying versus Monero with WM can change portfolio factor exposure.
- WM can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on WM sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of WM
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for WM.
- Trend failures on WM often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Monero and WM can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Monero holds market-cap $6.85B and rank #17; WM shows $83.05M and #283. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Monero. Where durability matters, watch Monero. AI composite scores (58.40/58.40) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Monero or WM?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Monero leads on market cap today, while Monero leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, XMR or WM?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Monero and WM.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Monero currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Monero, but longer windows can disagree.