Overview
Investors searching XMR vs RAY usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. XMR prints $118.70 (+4.77%) while RAY is at $0.606500 (+0.13%), with volume edge currently on XMR.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | XMR | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $118.70 | $0.606500 |
| Market Cap | $6.83B | $163.42M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $574,681.08 | $226,513.82 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 17.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | XMR | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +4.77% | +0.13% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | XMR | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on XMR and bearish on RAY. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | XMR | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
XMR
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of XMR
- Composite PEPS readings for XMR can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- XMR typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for XMR can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of XMR
- Large-cap status for XMR can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on XMR may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit XMR harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of RAY
- Diversifying versus XMR with RAY can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around RAY can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for RAY still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on RAY sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of RAY
- Trend failures on RAY often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for RAY.
- Higher volatility on RAY cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put XMR at $118.70 and RAY at $0.606500. Relative performance over 24h (XMR) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, XMR or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. XMR leads on market cap today, while XMR leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, XMR or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both XMR and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. XMR currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is XMR, but longer windows can disagree.