Overview
Kinesis Silver (KAG) and Shuffle (SHFL) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($52.21 vs $0.266989), market leadership still favors Kinesis Silver on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by Kinesis Silver.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | KAG | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $52.21 | $0.266989 |
| Market Cap | $194.31M | $113.53M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $135,261.00 | $1.43M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 159.00 | 237.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | KAG | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.20% | -11.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | KAG | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (56.80 vs 56.80) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | KAG | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Kinesis Silver
Shuffle
Pros and cons
Pros of Kinesis Silver
- KAG often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Kinesis Silver typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Kinesis Silver has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of Kinesis Silver
- Crowded positioning around KAG sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on Kinesis Silver may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, Kinesis Silver can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Shuffle
- If technical momentum aligns, Shuffle may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Shuffle can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around Shuffle can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of Shuffle
- Relative underperformance versus Kinesis Silver can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Shuffle more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, Kinesis Silver looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, Kinesis Silver is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. Kinesis Silver and Shuffle solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, Kinesis Silver or Shuffle?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Kinesis Silver leads on market cap today, while Kinesis Silver leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, KAG or SHFL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Kinesis Silver and Shuffle.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Shuffle currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Kinesis Silver, but longer windows can disagree.