Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means JUP and Filecoin are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.193300 | $0.712400 |
| Market Cap | $641.70M | $562.65M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.50M | $4.07M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 88.00 | 90.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +5.38% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -1.48% | +0.15% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 46.58 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 0.04 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 25.54 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 0.67 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.82 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for JUP/FIL currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JUP
Filecoin
Pros and cons
Pros of JUP
- Market-cap scale on JUP may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- JUP often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for JUP can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of JUP
- Indicator stacks on JUP may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around JUP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit JUP harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of Filecoin
- If technical momentum aligns, Filecoin may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for Filecoin still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around Filecoin can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Filecoin can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Filecoin
- Relative underperformance versus JUP can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Filecoin.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for JUP on size and Filecoin on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. JUP holds market-cap $641.70M and rank #88; Filecoin shows $562.65M and #90. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Filecoin. Where durability matters, watch JUP. AI composite scores (58.20/45.40) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, JUP or Filecoin?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JUP leads on market cap today, while Filecoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or FIL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JUP and Filecoin.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Filecoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Filecoin, but longer windows can disagree.