Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Immutable vs Kinesis Silver” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | IMX | KAG |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.111663 | $51.61 |
| Market Cap | $223.41M | $192.13M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $6.34M | $109,038.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 264.00 | 163.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | IMX | KAG |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.20% | +0.30% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | IMX | KAG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for IMX/KAG currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | IMX | KAG |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Immutable
Kinesis Silver
Pros and cons
Pros of Immutable
- IMX often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Immutable typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for Immutable can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Immutable
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Immutable harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on Immutable may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of Kinesis Silver
- PEPS tracking for Kinesis Silver still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Kinesis Silver can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on KAG sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Kinesis Silver
- Higher volatility on KAG cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus Immutable can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Kinesis Silver more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Immutable on size and Immutable on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Immutable holds market-cap $223.41M and rank #264; Kinesis Silver shows $192.13M and #163. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Immutable. Where durability matters, watch Immutable. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Immutable or Kinesis Silver?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Immutable leads on market cap today, while Immutable leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, IMX or KAG?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Immutable and Kinesis Silver.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Immutable currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Immutable, but longer windows can disagree.