Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means HYPE and HASH are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HYPE | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,861.70 | $1,861.70 |
| Market Cap | $11.60B | $453.39M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $249.05M | $2,642.11 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 10.00 | 103.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HYPE | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.30% | -5.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HYPE | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across HYPE and HASH, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HYPE | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
HYPE
HASH
Pros and cons
Pros of HYPE
- Higher ranking for HYPE can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for HYPE can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on HYPE may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of HYPE
- Large-cap status for HYPE can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit HYPE harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of HASH
- Narrative optionality around HASH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus HYPE with HASH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, HASH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on HASH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of HASH
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for HASH.
- Trend failures on HASH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave HASH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. HYPE and HASH can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. HYPE and HASH solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, HYPE or HASH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. HYPE leads on market cap today, while HYPE leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HYPE or HASH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both HYPE and HASH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. HYPE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is HYPE, but longer windows can disagree.