Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Humanity and Backpack are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | H | BP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.075457 | $0.369810 |
| Market Cap | $150.18M | $92.46M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $7.63M | $1.15M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 196.00 | 268.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | H | BP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +13.80% | -0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | H | BP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Humanity and Backpack, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | H | BP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Humanity
Backpack
Pros and cons
Pros of Humanity
- H often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Market-cap scale on Humanity may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for Humanity can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Humanity
- Indicator stacks on Humanity may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around H sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Humanity harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of Backpack
- If technical momentum aligns, Backpack may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around Backpack can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for Backpack still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Backpack
- Relative underperformance versus Humanity can persist through entire market regimes.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Backpack more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on BP cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Humanity and Backpack can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Humanity (H) trades near $0.075457 with a +13.80% day move, while Backpack (BP) is around $0.369810 (-0.10%). Volume leadership currently sits with Humanity, and market-cap leadership with Humanity. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Humanity or Backpack?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Humanity leads on market cap today, while Humanity leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, H or BP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Humanity and Backpack.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Humanity currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Humanity, but longer windows can disagree.