Overview
This page compares GUSD and 1INCH with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#196 vs #233) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GUSD | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $0.081600 |
| Market Cap | $149.63M | $114.68M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $710,728.00 | $357,624.93 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 196.00 | 233.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GUSD | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.10% | +0.99% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GUSD | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GUSD | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GUSD
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of GUSD
- GUSD has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for GUSD can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- GUSD typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of GUSD
- Large-cap status for GUSD can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit GUSD harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of 1INCH
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus GUSD with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- 1INCH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of 1INCH
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave 1INCH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on 1INCH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (GUSD) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (1INCH) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. GUSD and 1INCH solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, GUSD or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GUSD leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GUSD or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GUSD and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. GUSD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.