Overview
From a portfolio lens, US ($553.11M) and GNO ($278.88M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | US | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,887.28 | $105.93 |
| Market Cap | $553.11M | $278.88M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $8.57M | $79,300.95 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 184.00 | 130.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | US | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -2.30% | +2.92% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | US | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on US and bearish on GNO. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | US | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
US
GNO
Pros and cons
Pros of US
- Composite PEPS readings for US can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- US has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on US may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of US
- When dominance narratives fade, US can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit US harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around US sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for US can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of GNO
- Narrative optionality around GNO can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, GNO may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus US with GNO can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of GNO
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave GNO more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: US (US) trades near $1,887.28 with a -2.30% day move, while GNO (GNO) is around $105.93 (+2.92%). Volume leadership currently sits with US, and market-cap leadership with US. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, US or GNO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. US leads on market cap today, while GNO leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, US or GNO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both US and GNO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. US currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GNO, but longer windows can disagree.