Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Gnosis vs Data Network” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GNO | DATA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $105.09 | $0.216105 |
| Market Cap | $277.16M | $77.25M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.02M | $1.46M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 130.00 | 298.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GNO | DATA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.60% | -0.40% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GNO | DATA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Gnosis and Data Network, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GNO | DATA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Gnosis
Data Network
Pros and cons
Pros of Gnosis
- Gnosis has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for Gnosis can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Gnosis typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Gnosis
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Gnosis harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on Gnosis may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of Data Network
- Narrative optionality around Data Network can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus Gnosis with Data Network can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Data Network can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Data Network
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Data Network more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on Data Network often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Gnosis and Data Network can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Gnosis (GNO) trades near $105.09 with a +1.60% day move, while Data Network (DATA) is around $0.216105 (-0.40%). Volume leadership currently sits with Data Network, and market-cap leadership with Gnosis. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Gnosis or Data Network?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Gnosis leads on market cap today, while Gnosis leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GNO or DATA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Gnosis and Data Network.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Data Network currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Gnosis, but longer windows can disagree.