Overview
Whether you arrived from a “GNO vs PENDLE” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GNO | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $104.16 | $1.38 |
| Market Cap | $274.90M | $236.53M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $99,497.98 | $1.02M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 129.00 | 145.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GNO | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.55% | -1.36% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GNO | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for GNO/PENDLE currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GNO | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GNO
PENDLE
Pros and cons
Pros of GNO
- Composite PEPS readings for GNO can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for GNO can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- GNO often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of GNO
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit GNO harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, GNO can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of PENDLE
- Diversifying versus GNO with PENDLE can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PENDLE can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around PENDLE can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of PENDLE
- Trend failures on PENDLE often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for PENDLE.
- Relative underperformance versus GNO can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for GNO on size and PENDLE on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put GNO at $104.16 and PENDLE at $1.38. Relative performance over 24h (GNO) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, GNO or PENDLE?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GNO leads on market cap today, while GNO leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GNO or PENDLE?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GNO and PENDLE.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. PENDLE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GNO, but longer windows can disagree.