Overview
Investors searching JST vs GNO usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. JST prints $0.106500 (+2.33%) while GNO is at $105.08 (+1.59%), with volume edge currently on JST.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JST | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.106500 | $105.08 |
| Market Cap | $871.60M | $277.08M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.54M | $86,545.77 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 73.00 | 130.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JST | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.33% | +1.59% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JST | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, JST shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while GNO sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JST | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JST
GNO
Pros and cons
Pros of JST
- JST has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for JST can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on JST may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of JST
- Large-cap status for JST can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit JST harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, JST can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of GNO
- Narrative optionality around GNO can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for GNO still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on GNO sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of GNO
- Trend failures on GNO often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave GNO more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus JST can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for GNO.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to JST, while short-term performance leans toward JST. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. JST and GNO solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, JST or GNO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JST leads on market cap today, while JST leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JST or GNO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JST and GNO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JST currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is JST, but longer windows can disagree.