Overview
GNO vs APE is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GNO | APE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $104.93 | $0.132300 |
| Market Cap | $276.84M | $132.11M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $90,149.78 | $424,672.97 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 130.00 | 212.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GNO | APE |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.96% | +1.15% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GNO | APE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GNO | APE |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GNO
APE
Pros and cons
Pros of GNO
- Higher ranking for GNO can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on GNO may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for GNO can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of GNO
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit GNO harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, GNO can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on GNO may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for GNO can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of APE
- Narrative optionality around APE can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus GNO with APE can change portfolio factor exposure.
- APE can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of APE
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for APE.
- Higher volatility on APE cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave APE more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (GNO) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (APE) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put GNO at $104.93 and APE at $0.132300. Relative performance over 24h (APE) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, GNO or APE?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GNO leads on market cap today, while APE leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GNO or APE?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GNO and APE.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. APE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is APE, but longer windows can disagree.