Overview
USDG vs USDY is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDG | USDY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.52 | $1,880.52 |
| Market Cap | $3.40B | $2.15B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $88.41M | $2.11M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 28.00 | 40.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDG | USDY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.10% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDG | USDY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across USDG and USDY, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDG | USDY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDG
USDY
Pros and cons
Pros of USDG
- Composite PEPS readings for USDG can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for USDG can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on USDG may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of USDG
- When dominance narratives fade, USDG can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for USDG can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of USDY
- Narrative optionality around USDY can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus USDG with USDY can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, USDY may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of USDY
- Trend failures on USDY often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave USDY more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus USDG can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. USDG and USDY can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: USDG (USDG) trades near $1,880.52 with a -0.10% day move, while USDY (USDY) is around $1,880.52 (+0.00%). Volume leadership currently sits with USDG, and market-cap leadership with USDG. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, USDG or USDY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDG leads on market cap today, while USDY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDG or USDY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDG and USDY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USDG currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is USDY, but longer windows can disagree.