Overview
From a portfolio lens, GHO ($647.90M) and Aptos ($529.32M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GHO | APT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $0.563000 |
| Market Cap | $647.90M | $529.32M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.37M | $2.28M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 86.00 | 102.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +5.13% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GHO | APT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +2.18% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GHO | APT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 40.11 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 0.03 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 28.30 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.64 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, GHO shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while Aptos sits at RSI 40.11 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GHO | APT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GHO
Aptos
Pros and cons
Pros of GHO
- Market-cap scale on GHO may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- GHO typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for GHO can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of GHO
- Crowded positioning around GHO sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, GHO can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Aptos
- If technical momentum aligns, Aptos may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Aptos can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus GHO with Aptos can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for Aptos still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Aptos
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus GHO can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Aptos more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to GHO, while short-term performance leans toward Aptos. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put GHO at $1,880.40 and Aptos at $0.563000. Relative performance over 24h (Aptos) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, GHO or Aptos?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GHO leads on market cap today, while Aptos leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GHO or APT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GHO and Aptos.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Aptos currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Aptos, but longer windows can disagree.