Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means FDUSD and 1INCH are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | FDUSD | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.998200 | $0.081400 |
| Market Cap | $349.20M | $114.26M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $11.94M | $323,022.75 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 116.00 | 236.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | FDUSD | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.02% | +0.87% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | FDUSD | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across FDUSD and 1INCH, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | FDUSD | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
FDUSD
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of FDUSD
- FDUSD has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- FDUSD typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for FDUSD can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of FDUSD
- When dominance narratives fade, FDUSD can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit FDUSD harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for FDUSD can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of 1INCH
- Diversifying versus FDUSD with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of 1INCH
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave 1INCH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus FDUSD can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. FDUSD and 1INCH can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: FDUSD (FDUSD) trades near $0.998200 with a +0.02% day move, while 1INCH (1INCH) is around $0.081400 (+0.87%). Volume leadership currently sits with FDUSD, and market-cap leadership with FDUSD. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, FDUSD or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. FDUSD leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, FDUSD or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both FDUSD and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. FDUSD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.