Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means USDF and Cosmos Hub are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDF | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.52 | $1.27 |
| Market Cap | $1.42B | $723.29M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $238,055.00 | $1.46M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 52.00 | 85.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +4.22% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDF | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.10% | +4.02% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDF | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 18.97 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.05 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 51.19 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1.61 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDF | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 1,299.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDF
Cosmos Hub
Pros and cons
Pros of USDF
- USDF often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Market-cap scale on USDF may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- USDF has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of USDF
- Indicator stacks on USDF may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, USDF can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Cosmos Hub
- PEPS tracking for Cosmos Hub still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, Cosmos Hub may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on ATOM sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Cosmos Hub can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Cosmos Hub
- Higher volatility on ATOM cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on Cosmos Hub often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (USDF) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Cosmos Hub) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: USDF (USDF) trades near $1,880.52 with a +0.10% day move, while Cosmos Hub (ATOM) is around $1.27 (+4.02%). Volume leadership currently sits with Cosmos Hub, and market-cap leadership with USDF. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/18.97. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, USDF or Cosmos Hub?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDF leads on market cap today, while Cosmos Hub leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDF or ATOM?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDF and Cosmos Hub.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Cosmos Hub currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Cosmos Hub, but longer windows can disagree.