Overview
Investors searching USDE vs WLD usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. USDE prints $1.00 (-0.04%) while WLD is at $0.314800 (+4.13%), with volume edge currently on WLD.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDE | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $0.314800 |
| Market Cap | $3.87B | $1.13B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.46M | $9.95M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 26.00 | 61.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDE | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.04% | +4.13% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDE | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (58.20 vs 58.20) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDE | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDE
WLD
Pros and cons
Pros of USDE
- USDE often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for USDE can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of USDE
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Indicator stacks on USDE may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, USDE can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of WLD
- PEPS tracking for WLD still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, WLD may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus USDE with WLD can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of WLD
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus USDE can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on WLD often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, USDE looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, WLD is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. USDE and WLD solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, USDE or WLD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDE leads on market cap today, while WLD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDE or WLD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDE and WLD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. WLD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is WLD, but longer windows can disagree.