Overview
From a portfolio lens, EDGE ($128.09M) and 1INCH ($114.84M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | EDGE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,874.22 | $0.081800 |
| Market Cap | $128.09M | $114.84M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $3.04M | $300,661.76 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 216.00 | 235.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | EDGE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.80% | +2.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | EDGE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, EDGE shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while 1INCH sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | EDGE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
EDGE
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of EDGE
- EDGE typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Market-cap scale on EDGE may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for EDGE can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of EDGE
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Indicator stacks on EDGE may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for EDGE can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around EDGE sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of 1INCH
- 1INCH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus EDGE with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of 1INCH
- Relative underperformance versus EDGE can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on 1INCH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to EDGE, while short-term performance leans toward EDGE. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. EDGE and 1INCH solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, EDGE or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. EDGE leads on market cap today, while EDGE leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, EDGE or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both EDGE and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. EDGE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is EDGE, but longer windows can disagree.