Overview
Whether you arrived from a “MANA vs SAND” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | MANA | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.066800 | $0.043220 |
| Market Cap | $130.85M | $129.61M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $251,208.12 | $453,000.54 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 213.00 | 233.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | MANA | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.06% | +4.60% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | MANA | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | MANA | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
MANA
SAND
Pros and cons
Pros of MANA
- Composite PEPS readings for MANA can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for MANA can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on MANA may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of MANA
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit MANA harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, MANA can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on MANA may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of SAND
- Active volume bursts on SAND sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus MANA with SAND can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for SAND still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around SAND can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of SAND
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for SAND.
- Higher volatility on SAND cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (MANA) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (SAND) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: MANA (MANA) trades near $0.066800 with a +1.06% day move, while SAND (SAND) is around $0.043220 (+4.60%). Volume leadership currently sits with SAND, and market-cap leadership with MANA. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, MANA or SAND?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. MANA leads on market cap today, while SAND leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, MANA or SAND?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both MANA and SAND.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. SAND currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is SAND, but longer windows can disagree.