Overview
Chainlink vs MANA is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LINK | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.33 | $0.066700 |
| Market Cap | $6.30B | $130.64M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $11.28M | $244,652.86 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 19.00 | 213.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.13% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LINK | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.63% | +0.15% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LINK | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 45.39 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.33 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 14.96 | 21.33 |
| Support | 8.20 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 8.73 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Chainlink and MANA, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LINK | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 87.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,703.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Chainlink
MANA
Pros and cons
Pros of Chainlink
- Market-cap scale on Chainlink may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Chainlink typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Chainlink has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of Chainlink
- Crowded positioning around LINK sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Chainlink can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of MANA
- MANA can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- If technical momentum aligns, MANA may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around MANA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of MANA
- Higher volatility on MANA cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on MANA often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Chainlink and MANA can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
Comparing LINK and MANA begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $8.33 versus $0.066700. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate MANA-vs-LINK pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Chainlink or MANA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Chainlink leads on market cap today, while Chainlink leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LINK or MANA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Chainlink and MANA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Chainlink currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Chainlink, but longer windows can disagree.