Overview
This page compares Cosmos Hub and Filecoin with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#85 vs #91) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ATOM | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.26 | $0.718600 |
| Market Cap | $723.29M | $562.65M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.50M | $4.32M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 85.00 | 91.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.22% | +5.67% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ATOM | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.78% | +1.08% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ATOM | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 18.97 | 42.21 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| ADX | 51.19 | 24.60 |
| Support | — | 0.67 |
| Resistance | 1.61 | 0.82 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ATOM | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Github activity | 1,299.00 | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Cosmos Hub
Filecoin
Pros and cons
Pros of Cosmos Hub
- ATOM often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Cosmos Hub has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on Cosmos Hub may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of Cosmos Hub
- Crowded positioning around ATOM sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, Cosmos Hub can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on Cosmos Hub may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of Filecoin
- If technical momentum aligns, Filecoin may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for Filecoin still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus Cosmos Hub with Filecoin can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of Filecoin
- Relative underperformance versus Cosmos Hub can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on FIL cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Filecoin more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (Cosmos Hub) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Cosmos Hub) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Cosmos Hub holds market-cap $723.29M and rank #85; Filecoin shows $562.65M and #91. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Filecoin. Where durability matters, watch Cosmos Hub. AI composite scores (49.00/45.50) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Cosmos Hub or Filecoin?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Cosmos Hub leads on market cap today, while Cosmos Hub leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ATOM or FIL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Cosmos Hub and Filecoin.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Filecoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Cosmos Hub, but longer windows can disagree.