Overview
Whether you arrived from a “STAC vs CHEEMS” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | STAC | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,882.43 | $1,882.43 |
| Market Cap | $102.75M | $101.20M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $288,119.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 252.00 | 254.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | STAC | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +5.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | STAC | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | STAC | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
STAC
CHEEMS
Pros and cons
Pros of STAC
- Market-cap scale on STAC may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for STAC can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- STAC typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of STAC
- Indicator stacks on STAC may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around STAC sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit STAC harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of CHEEMS
- PEPS tracking for CHEEMS still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- CHEEMS can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on CHEEMS sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, CHEEMS may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of CHEEMS
- Higher volatility on CHEEMS cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus STAC can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave CHEEMS more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (STAC) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (CHEEMS) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. STAC holds market-cap $102.75M and rank #252; CHEEMS shows $101.20M and #254. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch CHEEMS. Where durability matters, watch STAC. AI composite scores (58.20/58.20) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, STAC or CHEEMS?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. STAC leads on market cap today, while CHEEMS leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, STAC or CHEEMS?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both STAC and CHEEMS.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. CHEEMS currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is CHEEMS, but longer windows can disagree.