Overview
From a portfolio lens, BUIDL ($2.70B) and Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund ($117.92M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | THBILL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,855.02 | $1.02 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $117.92M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $10,273.70 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 35.00 | 228.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | THBILL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | THBILL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 64.00 | 64.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, BUIDL shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | THBILL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- Higher ranking for BUIDL can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on BUIDL may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for BUIDL can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of BUIDL
- Large-cap status for BUIDL can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, BUIDL can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on BUIDL may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BUIDL harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund
- Active volume bursts on THBILL sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Narrative optionality around Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund
- Trend failures on Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus BUIDL can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to BUIDL, while short-term performance leans toward BUIDL / Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: BUIDL (BUIDL) trades near $1,855.02 with a +0.00% day move, while Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund (THBILL) is around $1.02 (+0.00%). Volume leadership currently sits with Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund, and market-cap leadership with BUIDL. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while BUIDL / Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or THBILL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is BUIDL / Theo Short Duration US Treasury Fund, but longer windows can disagree.