Overview
Whether you arrived from a “BUIDL vs Cosmos Hub” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $1.26 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $723.29M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $1.49M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 35.00 | 85.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +4.09% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +3.19% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 27.59 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 0.05 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 51.72 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1.61 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 1,299.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
Cosmos Hub
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- Composite PEPS readings for BUIDL can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for BUIDL can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- BUIDL typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of BUIDL
- When dominance narratives fade, BUIDL can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around BUIDL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Cosmos Hub
- Narrative optionality around Cosmos Hub can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on ATOM sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Cosmos Hub can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus BUIDL with Cosmos Hub can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of Cosmos Hub
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Cosmos Hub.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Cosmos Hub more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus BUIDL can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on Cosmos Hub often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (BUIDL) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Cosmos Hub) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. BUIDL holds market-cap $2.70B and rank #35; Cosmos Hub shows $723.29M and #85. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Cosmos Hub. Where durability matters, watch BUIDL. AI composite scores (56.80/48.30) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or Cosmos Hub?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while Cosmos Hub leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or ATOM?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and Cosmos Hub.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Cosmos Hub currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Cosmos Hub, but longer windows can disagree.