Overview
Investors searching BUIDL vs ASTER usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. BUIDL prints $1,887.28 (+0.00%) while ASTER is at $0.605000 (+0.67%), with volume edge currently on ASTER.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | ASTER |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,887.28 | $0.605000 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $1.63B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $1.21M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 35.00 | 46.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | ASTER |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +0.67% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | ASTER |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, BUIDL shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while ASTER sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | ASTER |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
ASTER
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- BUIDL typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- BUIDL has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on BUIDL may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of BUIDL
- Indicator stacks on BUIDL may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, BUIDL can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of ASTER
- If technical momentum aligns, ASTER may outperform on medium-term windows.
- ASTER can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus BUIDL with ASTER can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of ASTER
- Higher volatility on ASTER cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus BUIDL can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on ASTER often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to BUIDL, while short-term performance leans toward ASTER. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. BUIDL holds market-cap $2.70B and rank #35; ASTER shows $1.63B and #46. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch ASTER. Where durability matters, watch BUIDL. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or ASTER?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while ASTER leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or ASTER?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and ASTER.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ASTER currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ASTER, but longer windows can disagree.