Overview
Investors searching BEAT vs UB usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. BEAT prints $1,861.70 (-21.50%) while UB is at $1,861.70 (+3.00%), with volume edge currently on BEAT.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BEAT | UB |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,861.70 | $1,861.70 |
| Market Cap | $1.20B | $415.61M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $55.55M | $26.20M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 59.00 | 106.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BEAT | UB |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -21.50% | +3.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BEAT | UB |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, BEAT shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while UB sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BEAT | UB |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BEAT
UB
Pros and cons
Pros of BEAT
- Composite PEPS readings for BEAT can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on BEAT may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for BEAT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of BEAT
- When dominance narratives fade, BEAT can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for BEAT can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of UB
- Diversifying versus BEAT with UB can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on UB sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- UB can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around UB can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of UB
- Trend failures on UB often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for UB.
- Relative underperformance versus BEAT can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to BEAT, while short-term performance leans toward UB. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. BEAT holds market-cap $1.20B and rank #59; UB shows $415.61M and #106. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch BEAT. Where durability matters, watch BEAT. AI composite scores (57.80/57.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, BEAT or UB?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BEAT leads on market cap today, while UB leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BEAT or UB?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BEAT and UB.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. BEAT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is UB, but longer windows can disagree.