Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Tether vs BEAT” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDT | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.999167 | $1,874.22 |
| Market Cap | $184.03B | $1.02B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $24.09B | $38.23M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 3.00 | 65.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDT | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.01% | -31.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDT | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for USDT/BEAT currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDT | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Tether
BEAT
Pros and cons
Pros of Tether
- Tether typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- USDT often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for Tether can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on Tether may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of Tether
- Crowded positioning around USDT sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, Tether can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of BEAT
- PEPS tracking for BEAT still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, BEAT may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus Tether with BEAT can change portfolio factor exposure.
- BEAT can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of BEAT
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus Tether can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave BEAT more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on BEAT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Tether on size and Tether on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Tether holds market-cap $184.03B and rank #3; BEAT shows $1.02B and #65. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Tether. Where durability matters, watch Tether. AI composite scores (58.40/58.40) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Tether or BEAT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Tether leads on market cap today, while Tether leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDT or BEAT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Tether and BEAT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Tether currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Tether, but longer windows can disagree.