Overview
This page compares BEAT and RAY with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#64 vs #179) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BEAT | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $0.611100 |
| Market Cap | $1.07B | $164.68M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $38.63M | $203,861.39 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 64.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BEAT | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -20.00% | +1.09% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BEAT | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for BEAT/RAY currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BEAT | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BEAT
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of BEAT
- Higher ranking for BEAT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- BEAT often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- BEAT has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of BEAT
- When dominance narratives fade, BEAT can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for BEAT can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around BEAT sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BEAT harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of RAY
- Diversifying versus BEAT with RAY can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around RAY can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for RAY still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on RAY sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of RAY
- Trend failures on RAY often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for RAY.
- Relative underperformance versus BEAT can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for BEAT on size and BEAT on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: BEAT (BEAT) trades near $1,880.40 with a -20.00% day move, while RAY (RAY) is around $0.611100 (+1.09%). Volume leadership currently sits with BEAT, and market-cap leadership with BEAT. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, BEAT or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BEAT leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BEAT or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BEAT and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. BEAT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.