Overview
From a portfolio lens, BEAT ($1.22B) and Filecoin ($562.65M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BEAT | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,853.59 | $0.720900 |
| Market Cap | $1.22B | $562.65M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $54.38M | $3.94M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 59.00 | 91.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +5.67% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BEAT | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -15.30% | +1.44% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BEAT | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 42.21 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.04 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 24.60 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 0.67 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.82 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on BEAT and bearish on FIL. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BEAT | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BEAT
Filecoin
Pros and cons
Pros of BEAT
- Higher ranking for BEAT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- BEAT has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on BEAT may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of BEAT
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BEAT harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around BEAT sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, BEAT can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Filecoin
- Narrative optionality around Filecoin can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on FIL sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for Filecoin still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Filecoin
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Filecoin more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Filecoin.
- Relative underperformance versus BEAT can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on Filecoin often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
Comparing BEAT and FIL begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,853.59 versus $0.720900. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate FIL-vs-BEAT pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, BEAT or Filecoin?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BEAT leads on market cap today, while Filecoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BEAT or FIL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BEAT and Filecoin.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. BEAT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Filecoin, but longer windows can disagree.