Overview
From a portfolio lens, Arbitrum ($543.44M) and Sei ($301.91M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ARB | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.081300 | $0.041410 |
| Market Cap | $543.44M | $301.91M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $4.36M | $804,200.96 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 95.00 | 129.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +5.47% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ARB | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.57% | +1.42% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ARB | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 42.16 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.00 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 22.88 | 21.33 |
| Support | 0.08 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 0.09 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Arbitrum shows RSI 42.16 with trend bias bearish, while Sei sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ARB | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 4.00 | 0.00 |
| Github activity | 101.00 | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Arbitrum
Sei
Pros and cons
Pros of Arbitrum
- Arbitrum has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for Arbitrum can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Arbitrum typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Arbitrum
- Large-cap status for Arbitrum can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of Sei
- Narrative optionality around Sei can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus Arbitrum with Sei can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Sei can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on SEI sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Sei
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Sei.
- Trend failures on Sei often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on SEI cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Arbitrum, while short-term performance leans toward Arbitrum. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Arbitrum (ARB) trades near $0.081300 with a +3.57% day move, while Sei (SEI) is around $0.041410 (+1.42%). Volume leadership currently sits with Arbitrum, and market-cap leadership with Arbitrum. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 42.16/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Arbitrum or Sei?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Arbitrum leads on market cap today, while Arbitrum leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ARB or SEI?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Arbitrum and Sei.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Arbitrum currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Arbitrum, but longer windows can disagree.