Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Aptos vs Gnosis” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | APT | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.564930 | $104.06 |
| Market Cap | $477.41M | $274.67M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $28.64M | $790,544.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 101.00 | 129.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +5.39% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | APT | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.10% | -0.80% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | APT | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 34.62 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.03 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 28.06 | 21.33 |
| Support | — | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 0.64 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for APT/GNO currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | APT | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Aptos
Gnosis
Pros and cons
Pros of Aptos
- Aptos typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Market-cap scale on Aptos may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for Aptos can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of Aptos
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, Aptos can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Gnosis
- PEPS tracking for Gnosis still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Gnosis can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on GNO sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Gnosis
- Higher volatility on GNO cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Gnosis more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Aptos on size and Aptos on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Aptos holds market-cap $477.41M and rank #101; Gnosis shows $274.67M and #129. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Aptos. Where durability matters, watch Aptos. AI composite scores (47.40/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Aptos or Gnosis?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Aptos leads on market cap today, while Aptos leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, APT or GNO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Aptos and Gnosis.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Aptos currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Aptos, but longer windows can disagree.