Overview
Investors searching BUIDL vs APT usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. BUIDL prints $1,841.41 (+0.00%) while Aptos is at $0.558000 (-1.24%), with volume edge currently on Aptos.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | APT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,841.41 | $0.558000 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $529.32M |
| FDV | — | $674.19M |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $2.10M |
| Circulating Supply | — | 845,544,162 |
| Total Supply | — | 1,206,603,815 |
| Max Supply | — | 2,100,000,000 |
| Rank | 34 | 103 |
| Dominance | 0.12% | 0.02% |
| Liquidity | 69.5/100 | 33.0/100 |
| Volatility | 3.50% | 5.13% |
| ATH | — | $19.92 |
| ATL | — | $0.555677 |
| ROI | — | -96.93% |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | APT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | +0.36% |
| 24H | +0.00% | -1.24% |
| 7D | — | -5.57% |
| 30D | — | -10.99% |
| 90D | — | -43.65% |
| 1Y | — | -86.77% |
| YTD | — | -66.31% |
| ALL | — | -96.93% |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | APT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 40.11 |
| MACD histogram | — | 0.00 |
| EMA20 | 1,850.66 | 0.59 |
| EMA50 | 2,164.66 | 0.64 |
| EMA100 | — | 0.75 |
| EMA200 | — | 1.17 |
| SMA50 | — | 0.61 |
| SMA200 | — | 0.91 |
| ATR | 66.45 | 0.03 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 28.30 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,853.40 | 0.64 |
| Trend | SHORT | SHORT |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 72.80 |
| Signal | BUY | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, BUIDL shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias SHORT, while Aptos sits at RSI 40.11 (SHORT). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | APT |
|---|---|---|
| Supply model | — | float 40.3% |
| Inflation | — | 2.14% |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| Whale activity | $0.000000 | $0.000000 |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
Aptos
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- BUIDL often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Market-cap scale on BUIDL may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for BUIDL can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of BUIDL
- Indicator stacks on BUIDL may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, BUIDL can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Aptos
- Aptos can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- If technical momentum aligns, Aptos may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around Aptos can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of Aptos
- Higher volatility on APT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus BUIDL can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on Aptos often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to BUIDL, while short-term performance leans toward BUIDL. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: BUIDL (BUIDL) trades near $1,841.41 with a +0.00% day move, while Aptos (APT) is around $0.558000 (-1.24%). Volume leadership currently sits with Aptos, and market-cap leadership with BUIDL. Technical trend labels read SHORT vs SHORT, with RSI near 54.31/40.11. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or Aptos?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while BUIDL leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or APT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and Aptos.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Aptos currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is BUIDL, but longer windows can disagree.