Overview
Investors searching FIL vs ACRED usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. Filecoin prints $0.712400 (+0.15%) while ACRED is at $1,865.83 (-0.10%), with volume edge currently on Filecoin.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | FIL | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.712400 | $1,865.83 |
| Market Cap | $562.65M | $115.03M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $4.07M | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 90.00 | 231.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +5.38% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | FIL | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.15% | -0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | FIL | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 46.58 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.04 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 25.54 | 20.44 |
| Support | 0.67 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 0.82 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Filecoin shows RSI 46.58 with trend bias bearish, while ACRED sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | FIL | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Filecoin
ACRED
Pros and cons
Pros of Filecoin
- Composite PEPS readings for Filecoin can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for Filecoin can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on Filecoin may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Filecoin has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of Filecoin
- When dominance narratives fade, Filecoin can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Filecoin harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of ACRED
- Narrative optionality around ACRED can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, ACRED may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on ACRED sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of ACRED
- Trend failures on ACRED often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on ACRED cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Filecoin, while short-term performance leans toward Filecoin. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Filecoin holds market-cap $562.65M and rank #90; ACRED shows $115.03M and #231. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Filecoin. Where durability matters, watch Filecoin. AI composite scores (45.40/58.20) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Filecoin or ACRED?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Filecoin leads on market cap today, while Filecoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, FIL or ACRED?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Filecoin and ACRED.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Filecoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Filecoin, but longer windows can disagree.