Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Chainlink vs ATH” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LINK | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.37 | $1,880.40 |
| Market Cap | $6.30B | $77.91M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $11.27M | $4.87M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 19.00 | 295.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.00% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LINK | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.54% | -0.80% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LINK | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 52.69 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.34 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 14.36 | 20.44 |
| Support | 8.20 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 8.73 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for LINK/ATH currently lean on separate regimes: neutral versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LINK | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 87.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,703.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Chainlink
ATH
Pros and cons
Pros of Chainlink
- Composite PEPS readings for Chainlink can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Chainlink has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- LINK often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of Chainlink
- When dominance narratives fade, Chainlink can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for Chainlink can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on Chainlink may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of ATH
- Active volume bursts on ATH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Narrative optionality around ATH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- ATH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus Chainlink with ATH can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of ATH
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ATH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ATH.
- Higher volatility on ATH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on ATH often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Chainlink on size and Chainlink on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. Chainlink and ATH solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, Chainlink or ATH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Chainlink leads on market cap today, while Chainlink leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LINK or ATH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Chainlink and ATH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Chainlink currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Chainlink, but longer windows can disagree.