Overview
Investors searching RUNE vs 1INCH usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. RUNE prints $0.446000 (+2.29%) while 1INCH is at $0.081500 (+0.99%), with volume edge currently on RUNE.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RUNE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.446000 | $0.081500 |
| Market Cap | $150.57M | $114.54M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $485,437.88 | $319,738.27 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 195.00 | 234.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RUNE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.29% | +0.99% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RUNE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, RUNE shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while 1INCH sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RUNE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RUNE
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of RUNE
- RUNE has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on RUNE may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for RUNE can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of RUNE
- Large-cap status for RUNE can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of 1INCH
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus RUNE with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for 1INCH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on 1INCH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of 1INCH
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave 1INCH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to RUNE, while short-term performance leans toward RUNE. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put RUNE at $0.446000 and 1INCH at $0.081500. Relative performance over 24h (RUNE) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, RUNE or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RUNE leads on market cap today, while RUNE leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RUNE or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RUNE and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. RUNE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RUNE, but longer windows can disagree.