Overview
Investors searching GRT vs 1INCH usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. GRT prints $0.014420 (+0.84%) while 1INCH is at $0.080600 (-1.35%), with volume edge currently on GRT.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GRT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.014420 | $0.080600 |
| Market Cap | $156.20M | $113.35M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $465,920.13 | $342,403.05 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 189.00 | 238.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GRT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.84% | -1.35% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GRT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (58.10 vs 58.10) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GRT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GRT
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of GRT
- GRT often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Market-cap scale on GRT may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for GRT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of GRT
- Indicator stacks on GRT may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, GRT can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of 1INCH
- PEPS tracking for 1INCH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of 1INCH
- Relative underperformance versus GRT can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, GRT looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, GRT is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
Comparing GRT and 1INCH begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.014420 versus $0.080600. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate 1INCH-vs-GRT pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, GRT or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GRT leads on market cap today, while GRT leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GRT or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GRT and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. GRT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GRT, but longer windows can disagree.