Overview
This page compares Optimism and 1INCH with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#162 vs #235) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | OP | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.086000 | $0.081600 |
| Market Cap | $216.56M | $114.68M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.65M | $328,033.31 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 162.00 | 235.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +6.00% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | OP | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.99% | +1.24% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | OP | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 31.27 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.01 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.21 | 21.33 |
| Support | — | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 0.10 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for OP/1INCH currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | OP | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Optimism
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of Optimism
- Optimism has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for Optimism can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on Optimism may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of Optimism
- Large-cap status for Optimism can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, Optimism can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around OP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Optimism harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of 1INCH
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus Optimism with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of 1INCH
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus Optimism can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Optimism on size and Optimism on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Optimism holds market-cap $216.56M and rank #162; 1INCH shows $114.68M and #235. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Optimism. Where durability matters, watch Optimism. AI composite scores (47.30/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Optimism or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Optimism leads on market cap today, while Optimism leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, OP or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Optimism and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Optimism currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Optimism, but longer windows can disagree.