Overview
Whether you arrived from a “GHO vs 1INCH” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GHO | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,887.28 | $0.081900 |
| Market Cap | $648.05M | $114.84M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.42M | $351,080.55 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 87.00 | 234.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GHO | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +1.36% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GHO | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across GHO and 1INCH, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GHO | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GHO
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of GHO
- Composite PEPS readings for GHO can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for GHO can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- GHO often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of GHO
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit GHO harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, GHO can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of 1INCH
- Active volume bursts on 1INCH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus GHO with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of 1INCH
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave 1INCH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. GHO and 1INCH can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: GHO (GHO) trades near $1,887.28 with a +0.00% day move, while 1INCH (1INCH) is around $0.081900 (+1.36%). Volume leadership currently sits with GHO, and market-cap leadership with GHO. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, GHO or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GHO leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GHO or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GHO and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. GHO currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.